|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Downweb Resampling
|
|
|
|
ADR* (Advanced Downweb Resampling) is the ultimate method for
digital acquisition from line-scan cameras at a variable web
speed. Unique advantages of ADR are:
|
|
*Patent pending
|
|
|
Acquisition from shutterless cameras
Improved Image quality
Permanent camera exposure and complete use of the resulting information
Fixed Pattern Noise due to electronic shutter is avoided
System reliability compatible with industrial needs
MuliCam drivers for Microsoft Windows® and Linux
|
|
ADR is a radically new paradigm for acquiring images from
line-scan cameras. Compared to traditional methods, ADR
achieves ultimate quality images from a simpler and more
reliable line-scan acquisition system.
|
|
In ADR, the line-scan camera operates at a constant cycling rate,
without involving electronic shutter. Still, the speed of motion
is allowed to fluctuate. High accuracy real-time digital
computation delivers acquired images reproducing exactly
the observed objects. By design, ADR faithfully preserves
the original shape and color scale features.
|
|
|
|
Line-Scan Acquisition
|
|
|
|
Despite the single dimension recorded by the camera,
two-dimensional images are provided. The second
dimension is obtained from the motion of the
observed scene relative to the camera. In the
figured example, the camera is fixed, and the
scene moves, but the reciprocal situation may
be found as well.
|
|
|
Note that in the industrial imaging community,
the word "web" designates a continuous stream of
material, such as glass or paper. However, line-scan
acquisition as discussed in this document may equally
involve inspecting a series of distinct objects, for
example conveyed on a moving band.
|
|
|
Whatever variant in the acquisition system, "web" will
be used for the imaged items, "downweb" for the
direction of motion, "web speed" for the speed
of motion, and "crossweb" for the direction
parallel to the linear sensor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Web Speed
|
|
The traditional line-scan acquisition method delivers one
crossweb line for each camera cycle. Consider for example
a line-scan camera operating at 10 kHz and observing a
web which movies at 100 inch/s. Each line corresponds to
a web portion measuring 1/100 inch in the downweb direction.
The analysis resolution in this direction is 100 dpi.
|
|
If the web speed changes, geometrical distortion occurs, as shown in this figure:
|
|
|
|
|
This emphasizes the fact that the camera line rate and the web
speed strictly determine the downweb resolution. If web speed
variation is anticipated, the camera line rate should be made
variable in proportion.
|
|
The traditional approach consists in sensing the web speed
during acquisition, and acting on the camera line rate to
maintain the proportion. An accepted way is to use of a motion
encoder, a device issuing electrical pulses at a rate
proportional to a rotation or translation speed. Euresys
line-scan-capable frame grabbers feature a rate converter
specially designed for controlling the camera line rate
from the encoder pulse rate.
|
|
Having a constant web speed during the acquisition is a way of
eluding the issue. However this may be impossible to achieve
for mechanical reasons. At best, it will be difficult to
maintain predictable speed accuracy. Industrial line-scan
acquisition definitely needs a solution to support web speed variation.
|
|
|
|
Electronic Shutter
|
|
The traditional approach takes for granted that supporting
web speed variation means adapting the camera line rate.
Unfortunately, a variable camera line rate may have a direct
effect on the camera sensitivity. Essentially, a line-scan
camera develops the electrical response to illumination during
the line cycle. A faster camera cycle shortens the exposure time,
yielding dimmer response, and conversely. If nothing special
is done, the brightness of the acquired image in the downweb
direction is modulated by the web speed.
|
|
The solution is to control the exposure inside the line-scan
camera with an electronic shutter. The following figure
illustrates the principle of line-scan exposure, without
and with an electronic shutter:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The electronic shutter principle controls the exposure in
making the linear sensor light-sensitive for a fixed amount
of time at each line, regardless of the camera cycling time.
Note that this exposure time should be set shorter than the
fastest expected camera line.
|
|
Without electronic shutter, the linear sensor is made
permanently light-sensitive, although the response of each
pixel is reset upon reading out the data.
|
|
|
|
ADR Acquisition
|
|
The ADR approach introduces an innovative solution to the web
speed variation issue. The camera is operated at a fixed cycling
rate, without electronic shutter. A motion encoder (or an equivalent
sensor) is still used to accurately measure the speed of motion,
but the measurement is not used to control the camera. The speed
information controls a patented interpolating device, aimed at
resampling the data provided by the camera.
|
|
The following figure illustrates this process:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this example, the camera runs at 20 kHz. The web speed
has changed from 50 inch/s to 200 inch/s, a 1-to-4 variation.
The figure represents the web. The top part has been scanned
at low speed, the bottom part at high speed. The information
collected from the camera relates to successive sections in
the web, with variable extensions in the downweb direction.
Camera data are combined with appropriate weights to build
resampled data corresponding to sections of equal size,
yielding an accurate and uniform 100 dpi resolution in this example.
|
|
The computations are performed in real-time with a much better
digital accuracy than the camera dynamics. The weighing
coefficients are evaluated with a proprietary patented
algorithm that constantly uses the speed information
obtained from the motion encoder. In the figure, the
coefficients are shown as illustrative values.
|
|
In ADR, the camera line rate will be chosen to satisfy the following requirements:
|
|
- The camera-scanned resolution is finer than the resampled resolution.
|
|
- The camera capability is not exceeded.
|
|
- The sensitivity is adequate.
|
|
|
|
|
Shutterless Cameras
|
|
Even with high resolution at high speed, some latest generation
industrial cameras simply do not provide the electronic shutter feature.
They use linear imaging sensors imported from the scanner and photocopy
industry, where the web speed can be accurately controlled.
|
|
This missing feature precludes the use of these cameras in case of
web speed variation. The ADR technology is an irreplaceable way of
using them with the flexibility required by industrial machine vision.
|
|
|
|
Improved Image Quality
|
|
With the ADR technology, the camera is continuously exposed,
and every part of the observed web is used to build the
acquired image. This is not the case with the traditional
approach, where the electronic shutter at low speed "wastes"
a substantial fraction of time blocking the optical information.
|
|
The sensitivity of the camera is as good as it can be,
and the signal-to-noise ratio of the resulting image is
optimal. In fact, ADR is the best way to acquire images
from a line-scan camera.
|
|
Beside the ideal sensitivity offered by ADR, a second-order
improvement is worth considering. Controlling the exposure
with an electronic shutter induces noise in the data delivered
by the camera. This polluting noise comes from electrical pulses
issued when the electronic shutter opens. Camera data sheets
report this as an increased FPN (Fixed Pattern Noise) when
electronic shuttering is in use.
|
|
The new technology smartly solves this issue.
With ADR, disabling the shutter makes the most out of a
shutter-equipped camera.
|
|
|
|
Reliability
|
|
From a system standpoint, the ADR approach is simpler than the
traditional one. There are fewer controls connecting the camera,
as neither the camera cycling rate nor the electronic shutter
has to be exercised. This simplicity is an asset for the
industrial robustness of the application.
|
|
Another acclaimed advantage of ADR is the operational
safety resulting from an operative range wider than the
camera line rate range.
|
|
Quite obviously, all line-scan cameras have speed performance limits.
At the high end of the range, an absolute limitation comes from
the time spent to read the data out of the camera. Traditional
shuttered applications usually encounter an even lower speed
limit caused by the selected exposure time.
|
|
The camera absolutely cannot operate above this limit. If by
chance the mechanical drive speeds up excessively, this
acceleration is notified by the motion encoder. In the
traditional approach, this results in attempting to "overdrive"
the camera. At best the camera loses information, at worst,
if no special preventative measure is taken, the camera hangs up.
|
|
Using ADR offers a remarkable comfort in this respect,
especially when troubleshooting the industrial application.
The mechanical system may very well operate at twice the
regular speed; this does not prevent the acquisition system
from delivering valuable images.
|
|
The same is true for the low end of the speed range. For electronic
reasons, the camera does not work below a certain limit. When the
mechanical system moves slowly (starting condition, for instance),
ADR will perform much better than the traditional approach. The
maximum-to-minimum operating speed ratio for ADR is currently
specified at 200.
|
|
Top
|
Euresys products comply with the RoHS Directive
|
|
|
Copyright © 1989 - 2010 Euresys s.a. All rights reserved - See Euresys Terms and Conditions
For questions about Euresys Company and Products please contact info@euresys.com
RPM Liège 0437408137 - TVA BE 437 408 137 - RC Liège 168 568
|
|